somalia
Historically, Somalia has always been more a collection of widely scattered settlements and clans than a unified country. During the 19th century, the British took one chunk and the Italians another. Upon independence in 1960, Somalia became one, at least on the map. In 1969, after years of instability, an autocratic army general named Mohamed Siad Barre seized power and kept Somalia together from 1969 to 1991, until the cold war ended.
Today, the clannishness is back in force with at least five different men claiming to be president of various portions of the country and scores of warlords who have divvied up virtually every city block and remote village for themselves. American attention is now focused elsewhere, but the problems that haunted Somalia a decade ago have festered.
One of the supposed presidents is Abdinur Ahmed Darman, a businessman who staged a large rally in Mogadishu in July 2003, during which he declared himself Somalia's head of state. Mr. Darman's business activities are diverse, including the printing of fake Somali shillings, according to the United Nations report.
Before Mr. Darman held his presidential rally, he took care of some key details: he hired a group of militiamen to protect him, a prerequisite for any leadership position in Somalia, and he opened an e-mail account with the address somalipresidency@yahoo.com.
Comments
Interestingly, one of the lessons here may be that the old colonial boundaries in Africa might best be ignored. If Puntland and Somaliland are doing fine on their own, why the need to create yet more internal tensions by forcing them back into a greater Somalia? The lesson could be applied elsewhere -- no need to rope Katangans into Congo, or Biafrans into Nigeria, or Zulu into South Africa. Let African borders reflect nationality for once.
Well, in my dreams, I suppose.
Posted by: Tacitus | November 26, 2003 1:22 AM
flashback.
Incidentally, Brendan, who hasn't been in a movie since speaking out against Black Hawk Down is in a play that's been getting some good reviews.
Posted by: zagg | November 26, 2003 9:21 AM
Wait, reflect "nationality" or ethnicity?
Posted by: d fresh | November 26, 2003 2:02 PM
Ethnicity, I suppose.
Posted by: Tacitus | November 27, 2003 2:30 PM
I took "nationality" to mean their tribal relationship, like the Hutus or Tutsis in Rwanda, which I guess would essentially be the same thing as "ethinicity".
Posted by: LionIndex | November 28, 2003 11:57 AM
HE IS A WONDER FUL MAN AND IN MY MIND HE IS THE PRESIDENT OK
Posted by: JUDY BAKER | January 25, 2004 8:25 AM
I support Mr. Darman because from what I know about him and the other supposed leaders, he seems to be the best qualified and can probably serve the nation best.
Posted by: Sarah | February 13, 2004 3:15 PM
fuck
Posted by: Anonymous | May 7, 2004 5:20 PM